Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority 1985 emma nottingham 57. Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority and another house of lords 1986 1 ac 112, 1985 3 all er 402, 1985 3 wlr 830, 1986 1 flr 224, 1986 crim lr 1, 2 bmlr 11. Such children are deemed to be capable of giving valid consent to advice or treatment without parental knowledge or agreement provided they have sufficient. Landmark cases in family law in searchworks catalog. As cited in childrens legal centre 1985 landmark decision for childrens rights. Article 8 and minors right to refuse medical treatment. Women and the law, susan atkins and brenda hoggett, 1984 brenda hale and susan atkins 54. January 20, 2012 for a competent, conscious, adult patient, the. Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority 1984 5 gillick competence any child who is under the age of 16 can consent, if he or she reaches a sufficient understanding and intelligence to be capable of making up his own mind on the matter requiring decision. Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority 1984 5 ministry of ethics. May 16, 2016 in the case of gillick v west norfolk and wisbech health authority 1986 1 ac 112 lord scarman said, at 185e. Under uk law a child moves into official adulthood at the point of their eighteenth birthday children act 1989 s105. Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority 19845 gillick competence any child who is under the age of 16 can consent, if he or she reaches a sufficient understanding and intelligence to be capable of making up his own mind on the matter requiring decision. This is essentially a child under the age of 16 who has been deemed to understand all aspects of the advice given to them by their doctor relating to their medical heath, treatment and procedures.
Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority 19845. The means by which to assess legal capacity in children under the age of 16 years, established in the case gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority 1985 2 a11 er 402. Gillick competence is a term originating in england and is used in medical law to decide whether a child under 16 years of age is able to consent to his or her own medical treatment, without the need for parental permission or knowledge. The case of gillick v west norfolk and wisbech aha 7 was a giant leap in childrens right jurisprudence as it was considered to be a pivot for child right autonomy in decision making, but little wonder why post gillick cases have either not followed it, been distinguished from it or avoided it through a reroute, by giving judgements that. Landmark cases in family law landmark cases stephen gilmore. The extent of a parents rights and duties with respect to the medical treatment of a child. The book gives communication with relatives as an exception to. The case of gillick v west norfolk and wisbech aha7 was a giant leap in childrens. The abolition of the marital rape exemption jonathan herring. Lord fraser stated that a doctor could proceed to give contraceptive advice and treatment to a girl under 16. The rights of a parent exist primarily to enable the parent to discharge his duty of maintenance, protection and education until he reaches such an age as to be able to look after himself and make his own decisions. Children and consent to medical treatment can be particularly complex. Typical positions of emancipation arise when the minor is married r v d 1984 ac 778, 791 or in the military.
Proxy access for patients aged 11 15 st austell healthcare have decided to allow young people aged 1115 years the right to consent to their parentscarer having access to their systmone online record for requesting medication only. Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority and department of health and social security 1986 ac 112. Mrs gillick, a roman catholic, has been in a fouryear dispute over the issue with west norfolk and wisbech health authority. Black lj, giving the lead judgment notes, at 61 that sometimes, family cases present problems that regrettably the courts cannot solve despite all their endeavours and this is one such case. Sage books essential law for counsellors and psychotherapists.
Feb 09, 2012 ebook is an electronic version of a traditional print book that can be read by using a personal computer or by using an ebook reader. Gillick competence is a term originating in england and is used in medical law to decide whether a child under 16 years of age is able to consent to their own medical treatment, without the need for parental permission or knowledge the standard is based on the 1985 decision of the house of lords in gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority. The extent to which the childs decisions are upheld as if they were an adult depends on a number of factors, such as the childs age and understanding, as well as the matter in issue and the severity of the consequences of the decision. Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority 1986 ac 112 consent capacity of minors competence to consent to medical. During his career he broke the magical 45 second barrier over 400 metres, was twice a european champion, became an olympian, was consistently ranked in the worlds top 10 400m athletes and holds irish records over the distance.
Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech aha article 8 and minors right to refuse medical treatment. The fraser guidelines refer to the guidelines set out by lord fraser in his judgment of the gillick case in the house of lords 1985, which apply specifically to contraceptive advice. It is important to treat each case or situation on an individual basis. Rights and interests of children ministry of ethics. Gillick competency and fraser guidelines nspcc learning. Mrs gillick was a mother with five daughters under the age of 16. Balancing childrens rights with the responsibility to. I ii 1 i i iif i the house of lords and the preceding decisions in gillick v west norfolk and wispech area health authority 1986 ac 112 r, hl. Biography david gillick is a retired irish international track and field athlete. David gillick cookbooks, recipes and biography eat your books.
No more having and holding, the abolition of the marital rape exemption jonathan herring. The gillick competency and fraser guidelines help people who work with children to balance the need to listen to childrens wishes with the responsibility to keep them safe. Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority and another. Pdf childrens consent and the zone of parental discretion. This was an appeal by the department of health and social security from a decision dated 20 december 1985 of the court of appeal, ante, p. Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority and department of health and social security 1986 ac 112 the gillick decision not just a highwater mark jane fortin 12. Mrs gillick was a mother of five children, one of whom had sought and received contraceptive advice from a local doctor whilst below the age at which she could lawfully consent to intercourse. West norfolk and wisbech area health authority 1984 q.
West norfolk and wisbech area health authority 1986 ac 112 see below, where the house of lords held that a child of sufficient age and understanding could consent to contraceptive treatment without parental consent. The start of this book came from a chance telephone discussion about childrens rights which transformed a dissertation idea into a. Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech aha 1985 ukhl 7. The standard is based on the 1985 decision of the house of lords in gillick v west norfolk and wisbech. Prohibition of female circumcision act 1985 phyllis livaha 56. Appeal allowed with costs, and declarations granted accordingly. Victoria gillick mrs gillick, against the order of woolf j 1984 1 all er 365, 1984. An ebook reader can be a software application for use on a computer such as microsofts free reader application, or a book sized computer that is used solely as a reading device such as nuvomedias rocket ebook. Gillick competence is a term originating in england and is used in medical law to decide. The family planning association has welcomed the judgement.
Capacity of children to make legal decisions gillick. New bibliography other bibliographies cite this for me. She says she has received thousands of letters of support and has the backing of the national housewives association with its 25,000 members. This study of the implications of gillick competence argues it is an unnecessary burden with an unethical foundation. He edited archbishop peter a comensolis book, in gods image. Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority pubmed. West norfolk and wisbech area health authority 1986 ac 112 see below, where the. Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority 1986 ac 112.
Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority. This factsheet outlines key findings from a 1985 judgement by the house of lords on a legal case which looked specifically at whether doctors should be able to give. Woolf j refused to grant the declarations sought by mrs gillick and dismissed the action see 1984 1 all er 365, 1984 qb 581. Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech aha 1985 ukhl 7 united. Jan 20, 2012 the case of gillick v west norfolk and wisbech aha has established what is now known as the gillick competent child. A mothers tale by victoria gillick, 9780340488010, available at book depository with free delivery worldwide. Children, gillick competency and consent for involvement in research. Such children are deemed to be capable of giving valid consent to advice or treatment without parental knowledge or agreement provided they have sufficient understanding to appreciate the nature, purpose, and. Appeal by father against order refusing direct contact and imposing a s9114 order. Gillick competence any child who is under the age of 16 can consent, if he. Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech aha kings college.
Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority and another house of lords lord fraser of tullybelton, lord scarman, lord bridge of. Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority 1986 1 ac 112 hl facts g, a mother of five girls, sought a declaration that guidance to doctors that they could in certain circumstances provide contraceptive treatment and advice to girls under 16 without their parents consent, was unlawful. She sought a declaration that it would be unlawful for a doctor to prescribe contraceptives to girls under 16 without the knowledge or consent of the parent. Templeman was also one of the dissenting judges in the famous case of gillick v west norfolk and wisbech aha 1986 ac 112, arguing, inter alia, that sub16yearold girls should not be having sex and, therefore, cannot legally consent to being prescribed contraceptives by a physician thus necessitating parental consent to obtain prescription. We can see how the position of children has changed if we compare re agarellis with gillick v. Oxford university press online resource centre chapter 14. Gillick v west norfolk and wisbech area health authority and department of health and social security 1984 q.
809 31 1331 1243 956 972 1542 1010 940 959 1437 427 1071 1322 507 1358 463 483 616 1456 1056 931 1043 291 226 264 37 300 258 160 1016 134 988 444